God hates flags

We were all boat people…

…once.

Okay, so maybe that statement is stretching things a bit far. I had a conversation with someone the other day in reference to that now-well-known phrase in relation to immigration, and their response was fair – “Yeah, but the Aboriginals probably immigrated here at some point as well… how far back should we go?”

Exactly! The point is no one is exempt from immigration – we are all descended from immigrants at some point.

But I’m getting ahead of myself… If you aren’t aware, one of the major political debates in Australia at the moment is that concerning immigration, refugees and boat people. Typically the Liberal Party (our main moderate right-wing party) has been tough on immigration, with our Labor Party (moderate left-wing; currently in government) have been less strict. The current debate has centred around accusations from the Liberal Party that people smuggling into Australia has gotten out of control since Labor took government in late 2007. Tony Abbott, Liberal Party leader, said this in an interview on Radio 3AW on April 2nd;

“Well, you’ve got to be a lot tougher than Mr Rudd has been. I mean he announced that he was going to be much more compassionate back in mid-2008 and since then a trickle of boats has become a flood. Under the Howard Government we got three boats a year; under the Rudd Government we’re getting three boats a week and all records are likely to be broken this year when it comes to unauthorised arrivals. So plainly you do need to be much tougher and I think it’s a pity, it’s more than that, it’s a tragedy, for many people, including the boat people who’ve drowned at sea, that Mr Rudd hasn’t been as tough post-election as he promised to be pre-election.”

But Unfortunately Mr. Abbott is quite ignorant of the facts about asylum seekers entering Australia. Not only is the so-called “flood” of boat people an underwhelming reality (Julian Burnside claimed in the Sydney Morning Herald on April 9th that, “Even at the current arrival rate, it would take 30 years of boat arrivals to fill the MCG.”), but Malcolm Fraser has written a crushing article in today’s Herald (April 15th), claiming;

“(The opposition) has said time and again that the government has lost control of Australia’s border protection knowing that that charge is false.

It is false because the number of asylum seekers – whether it be 4000 or 5000 a year – is not enough to alter the complexion of Australia or to challenge Australia’s values. It is false because the number of asylum seekers who come here by air with falsified papers has always outnumbered the number who come by boat.”

Continuing on, he says;

“Those coming by air claim to be students or on a holiday visa and when they get here they say they want to claim asylum. It means they have come on false papers with a false declaration and yet they are not shut up in detention centres, they are not vilified, they wander around the streets of Australia until their claims are judged. And only about 30 per cent have been found to meet the criteria to be granted refugee status.

Those who arrive by air are unseen, they do not represent a political problem and therefore nobody does anything about it. But the boats are visible.”

And the boats are indeed visible. In fact, so visible are these boats that the Rudd government has pushed aside their more humane policy on asylum seekers, folding under political pressure from the opposition in this election year. Now they are saying they are as tough as the Liberals, freezing any asylum claims from Sri Lanka and Afghanistan.

So how do we respond to such a political debate? As Australians? As Christians?

As Australians it is my understanding that we have always prided ourselves on being multicultural. So is this multiculturalism a farce? Are we only happy to indulge such peaceable living so long as it doesn’t affect me personally? (I live near Cronulla, Sydney, so the Cronulla riots come to mind…).

How do we understand our national security? Is there any virtue within me that deserves such security over-against another person simply because I was born in Australia? Why is my safety more important? Julian Burnside, speaking of Abbott’s claims about the Hazaras (a people group from Afghanistan), says this;

“Abbott mentioned the Hazaras from Afghanistan and suggested they would be safe in Pakistan. He is wrong. Hazaras have long been targeted by the Pashtun majority in Afghanistan. The Taliban are mostly Pashtun and have targeted the Hazaras mercilessly. The Taliban now control parts of Pakistan, especially around Quetta, where many Afghan Hazaras have fled for safety. Hazaras in Quetta fear to go into the street. Many of them have been shot on sight by Taliban.

To suggest that Hazaras are safe in Pakistan is either profoundly ignorant or profoundly cynical. It is equivalent to saying that German Jews could have found safety in Austria.”

How have so many Australians become so deaf to the cries of the persecuted people of the world? Is it fear of terrorism? Seeing as most terrorists are well-educated middle-class men, I highly doubt we would see such terrorists among people who are so desperate to escape their country that they climb into a boat and set sail, just hoping that they eventually hit land.

What about a Christian response to asylum seekers? Have we forgotten about Jesus’ appeal on behalf of the “least of these”? What about the fact that the earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it… Doesn’t that imply that national boundaries are, at best, arbitrary and artificial? Doesn’t it imply that God hates flags?…

It is too easy to become apathetic in our comfort and security, and forget about the poorest and most persecuted people in the world. Burnside writes about Abbott, a self-proclaimed Catholic;

“When he was asked how Jesus Christ would respond to boat arrivals, he sidestepped the sting in the question, saying that Australia cannot be a ”lifeboat to the world”.”

Or worse, look at what Michael Harvey reports Abbott saying in the April 6 edition of the Herald Sun;

“Asked what Jesus would do on the issue of asylum-seekers, he replied: “Don’t forget, Jesus drove the traders from the temple as well.””

And this is the problem for too many Christians – we simply ignore Jesus in the question of politics, particularly immigration, sometimes even misusing and twisting Jesus to support our views that contradict what he plainly said.

But remember that Jesus was a refugee. Matthew 2:13-15 tells us that. When Jesus warns us later in Matthew’s Gospel that he was a stranger and we did not welcome him … as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me, (25:43, 45), his comment should ring a deafening bell. Could it be that in supporting the sending back of boat people, and treating them inhumanely, we subject Jesus (a refugee) to the same treatment?

Forgive us, Lord, for we know exactly what we do.

MCA

Edwin Long's depiction of the Flight to Egypt - Yes, Jesus was a refugee...

Advertisements

Posted on April 15, 2010, in Advocacy, Current Events, Politics, Theology and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. My problem is not with the increase of asylum seekers, there are people out there in need and we are fortunate enough to be able to help!

    However, the idea that Australia is is benefiting through becoming more “multicultural” is somewhat backward. Generally speaking i dont consider Australia a multicultural country but increasingly it is becoming a sub-cultural country. The cronulla riots prooved this, a lack of understanding and respect from a number of sydneys sub cultures.

    We cant ignore the different ideologies and values that exist between cultures, I believe that where Australia has failed has been in encouraging cultural integration between migrants and residents. The fact the some migrants can live in Australia all their lives and never need to learn english prooves we have failed here.

    Who cares how many come here, i dont think we can do much to stop them… heck, i would be on one of those boats if i were them. I just think when they arrive, we need to show some due dilligence in accomodating and giving them the best chance when they are here.

  2. Good message Matty. I would like to draw attention to the fact that the Christian Democrat Party has a policy of specifically restricting Muslim immigration to Australia, which reminds me of Nazi policies to be perfectly frank. Be thoughtful when you vote, the Christian Democrats have some pretty distasteful policies.

  3. Hey Matt, I love your work!
    This is a topic I’m truly passionate about, and I just can’t get my head around the often heartless response I hear from Australians on this issue (particularly Australian Christians!!!).
    Bottom line: why would anyone risk their life in such a dramatic way if they really didn’t need to leave where they were?
    What I don’t understand is the constant use of irrational emotive arguments by those who are so afraid of ‘boat people,’ in the place of thoughtful reflection on the real issues here. At least I hope these positions (which tend to dehumanise the people involved) are not the result of thoughtful reflection, because that is truly something to be scared of!
    I also can’t help but feel physically sick by the constant classification of ‘us’ vs ‘them.’ It ends up being a desparate cry of ‘assimilate! assimilate!’ – with a sinister underlying theme of ‘multiculteralism = ‘your’ cultural heritage being annihilated by ‘ours’.”
    That’s probably too much passion, though, for near midnight, and so I’ll stop now or I’ll work myself up so much that I’ll never get to sleep…

  4. I have a problem with the idea of integration… actually, I have a problem with how it is commonly used. It comes up a lot when we talk about immigration and asylum seekers. Why do immigrants need to learn english if they don’t have to? So they become more like us? As if we are better? As if our language is better? Why don’t we learn theirs?

    We expect immigrants to conform to ‘australian’ culture like it has always existed and like it’s the best possible culture to have. We forget that what constitutes ‘australian’ culture today has been primarily influenced and set up by those who immigrated here in the late 1700’s. Our ‘national’ identity is actually based more on the identity of our immigrant ancestors (the first fleet) than anything else. Australia as we know it would not even exist without immigration.

    I hate the way we expect immigrants to adopt our way of life when we never moved an inch to adopt the aboriginal way of life when we first arrived. When we talk of integration….. can we trash the idea of one-sided integration please? If we are serious about it…… let’s be open to adjusting our white anglo middle class cultural behaviours to be more accommodating of other cultures that clearly reflect how the majority of the world really lives.

  5. Josh – Hey mate, sorry I took so long to get your comment approved, it got lost in my setup, and I never got an email from WordPress about it…

    Totally agree with your comment too…

    Matt

  1. Pingback: The Great Wall of Australia « life.re-mixed

Leave a Response

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: